Comments on: Mount Kinabalu is NOT the highest mountain in South East Asia

By: anut

anut — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 20:08:52 +0000

in part of kesatuan yes! but in the geology/geographical study they said the mount in the indon n the one in myanmar is not a part of asean…just a country boundaries make it in the SEA region. for the information..only mount KK that have the facility for amateur hiking…the other need a lot of money if u want to conquer it… the point that tourism malaysia use is the geology/geographical. the research by the profesional. the range that in myanmar and indon is not from the country itself. it is from the center (himalaya for Ganlanzi..n australia or oceania plat) n Mt KK is come from croker and croker itselt was in sabah only not share with kalimantan even sarawak. we should change to ‘the highest mountain in SEA geographical region’ i guess..

By: JoeL

JoeL — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:41:54 +0000

I read that Mt.Kinabalu is already ranked at 1oth??!

1. Hkakaborazi, 5881m, Myanmar
2. Ganlanrazi, 5834m, Myanmar
3. Dindawrazi, 5464m, Myanmar
4. Sheankalarazi, 4998m, Myanmar
5. Puncak Jaya, 4884m, Indonesia
6. Trikora, 4751m, Indonesia
7. Mandala, 4701m, Indonesia
8. Pangramrazi, 4655m, Myanmar
9. Phonnyinrazi, 4560m, Myanmar
10. Mt. Kinabalu, 4094m, Malaysia

By: Thet Oo 24/06/1984

Thet Oo 24/06/1984 — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:16:42 +0000

Wow Hkakabo Razi what a wicked name. And to those claiming geography as to why Kinabalu is tallest, please go study a map of the world.

By: Ridzlam

Ridzlam — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:03:59 +0000

I think none of the mountains above is the highest in Southeast Asia, it is Bukit Timah in Singapore. LOL!

By: bondan

bondan — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:50:23 +0000

then malaysia tourisment’s commercial advert I saw today on discovery channel is a TOTAL LIE! They said they have the tallest peak in se asia……